Is it mean or racist to not call a lawyer “Dr. John Smith”

Now, here’s the thing the J.D. in America used to be called the Bachelor of Laws (LL.B.). As late as the 1960s, US law schools still used LL.B. The J.D. is considered a professional degree. It is a common understanding that a doctor refers to someone who has conducted significant accredited and supervised research in their field or practices medicine. That is someone who has earned an advanced research degree or a postgraduate medical degree. 

Calling lawyers “Dr” is still non-standard practice in the US, regardless of race or ethnicity. Esquire, or Esq., gets the job done by saying you are a lawyer. 

African Americans value the title “doctor” and “Dr.” earned through completing terminal research degrees. We use it and “professor” more frequently professionally and academically due to having our achievements, educational or otherwise, ignored, belittled, and attacked for centuries. Due to this past, we often find some Whites’ leveling and familiar tendencies offensive This means there is a cultural difference regarding the importance of earned titles. 

Continue reading “Is it mean or racist to not call a lawyer “Dr. John Smith””

Why is Aaron Henry forgotten? Plog #6

 Aaron Henry of Mississippi is the unsung political revolutionary of the Civil Rights Movement. Henry’s story is that of a young man reared in the methodology of Booker T. Washington who grows into an activist, one who upends the assumed dynamic-paralysis of White supremacist Mississippi. Henry does so as a political innovator who develops paradigmatic-solutions through parallel structure subversion. President of the Mississippi NAACP, Henry also helped found the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party (MFDP). The MFDP organized voter drives, parallel mock elections, rival convention delegations, and subverted the official Democratic Party of Mississippi – the most totalitarian White supremacist political organization in America – until it was forced to yield to Black inclusion and power sharing. The French radical theorist of insurgency Bernard Fall argued that “When a country is being subverted it is not being outfought; it is being out-administered.” Henry translated his agitation into a machine that out-politicked the segregationist political machine. White supremacists said Blacks were bad citizens and wouldn’t vote, whereas the MFDP showed that the most oppressed Black population in American would turn up to even mock elections if given the chance. Henry was a complex man who could be difficult to work with as in his disagreements with Fannie Lou Harmer. His sexuality has been studied by scholars of Black Southern down-low and queer history; this highlights Henry’s uniqueness as he faced the dangers of violent hyper-masculine and chauvinist racism when red-baiting was joined by gay-baiting as an anti-Civil Rights tactic. Sexual mores were far more restrictive than in the twenty-first century, and yet Henry survived politically. Eventually Henry was elected to Mississippi House Representatives and served fourteen years. Aaron Henry’s is an intriguing, messy, complicated, story worthy of greater inclusion in Civil Rights history discourse.

DEI Competency and Stress. Plog #5

DEI competency accounts for stress. The best companies know that a workforce is only as strong as its mental and emotional stability. That is why companies are making allowances for employee personal days in addition to vacation. If you want the best talent, note that they will come from varying backgrounds, identities and yes, stress-thresholds. Build to keep your team strong and you will be rewarded with loyal and high performing professionals.

Schattenbrüder 2017

Missing brother, overlook

Neununddreißig und Tod

Ist mein Unglück

Apart in life bound in Blut

Unforgotten but missed

Panther Princes flown amiss

Distressed time soon forsook

Zu unserem Vater gehören wir noch

DEI is competency. Plog #4

The goal of any organization is to produce its best work possible. The workplaces that lack diversity can lack human perspective, gifts, and talents. Diversity, therefore, enables your organization to create superior work and better products. Inclusion must flow from diversity, from variety, as you want an active and present team. You want a fair and open inquiry and engagement culture because embracing comfortable falsehoods inculcates creative incompetence. Inclusion is the active ingredient that makes diversity work and gives it purpose. Equity, both as fairness and shared value, flows from inclusion. Internally you establish equity by ensuring procedural, process, and resources fairness. Equity sets your team up to win by providing the staffing and budget to do the work. Embracing internal equity positions your team to build value with your clients and customers by taking their cultures and lifestyles seriously. When clients see your work as worth their attention and valuable to themselves, you are on track to build brand equity and customer loyalty. When you fear DEI or only embrace and reward team members like you and match your background or preconceptions, your organization is only a few steps from nepotism. The competition is too fierce in many fields not to embrace being competently diverse. Again, the goal of any organization is to produce its best work possible. Talent and team DEI empowers your competencies.

What’s up with the new palaces. Plog #3

In Turkey and Bolivia, long-serving leaders who should have been term-limited have used the extension of their reigns to construct new executive mansions. Why? It seems an odd thing considering that the greatest republic in history, the United States, has had the same presidential palace since 1800, only enlarging it as necessary. But Evo Morales saw fit to build a huge presidential skyscraper that violated the height ordinances of Nuestra Señora de La Paz, the Bolivian capital. He had to hold a vote to overrule the height restrictions to build the 29-level Casa Grande del Pueblo. But what was the purpose, why did the Bolivian presidency require it? The same could be asked of Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey, whose palace of 1100 rooms opened in 2014, in the capital of Ankara. The Cumhurbaşkanlığı Külliyesi or Presidential Complex cost over half-a-billion dollars. Is it odd that long-ruling leaders of republics are building great palaces like the monarchs of the past? In neither case is it a response to an apparent deficiency with the old residence. While both presidents trumpeted themselves as the herald of a new era, the projects appear to differ in historical direction. In Bolivia, Morales demolished the historic 1821 Casa Alencastre, an old residence of the Catholic archbishop, breaking with the past and pushing toward a secular Bolivian modernity. In Turkey, however, the use of the term Külliyesi is a curious one because it means a “complex” which is centered on a mosque, a clear nod to the Ottoman past and a break with the secular history of modern Turkey. Again, like old hereditary monarchs, these long-ruling authoritarian presidents have used palaces to cement their legacies. But should we be surprised? Vanity of vanities. 

Racism is Heresy. Plog #2

The roots racism which I1 call a heresy, began in fifteen-century Spain near the conclusion of the holy wars of the Reconquista. The Christian victories brought large Muslim and Jewish populations under the rule of the Iberian Christian princes. For various reasons, including genuine conversion, threats of violence, social pressure, and a desire to advance in society by adopting the religion of the new overlords, many Muslims and Jews converted to Catholicism. The converted were denoted by former religious adherence, either conversos, former Jews or moriscos, former Muslims. However, Spanish Christian animosity influenced by the legacy of warfare and resentment of the upper-class position as professionals and courtiers occupied by many converted created an obsessive fixation on the truth of their adherence to the Catholic faith. In practice, many “old Christian” Spaniards did not want to treat the converted as fellow Christians, even if the concerned families had been apparent practicing Christians for generations. Known as the Limpieza de sangre, the Spanish judged an individual’s status in the community of the Church based on their ancestry. If an individual had the “wrong” ancestry their public confession of faith was insufficient. This was a heresy, plain and simple, and was opposed by Church authorities at the time. But the heresy persisted as individual and government bias against the converted, eventually becoming part of Spanish law in the sixteenth century and leading to violence and expulsions with many victims. This was the beginning of racism, the belief that one’s ancestry could impede one’s acceptance as a Christian or invalidate requirements that other Christians treat you as a brother or sister in the faith. Simply put you could treat human beings badly based on their descent even if that violated your religious ethics. You could sin against people and their descendant forever, especially the indigenous peoples and the African slaves in the Americas. 

(quick notes)

Albert Thompson1

https://www.britannica.com/topic/limpieza-de-sangre

https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780195399301/obo-9780195399301-0101.xml

Plogs or Blogs? Plog #1

I find that often a good idea can be explained in a paragraph. Problems with being a succinct thinker and explainer. However that does not make for good essays of blogs. Or could it? I’ll find out by starting new section called Plogs: paragraph blogs. Plogs sounds better the short blogs or “slogs”, either way this is the first one. I will write short blogs about topics of interests. There, that’s the message.

An Ecological Snapshot of Racial Inequity: How We Got Here and Where We Need to Go Together

“An Ecological Snapshot of Racial Inequity: How We Got Here and Where We Need to Go Together” was a webinar presented on September 22, 2020 with guest speaker, Mr. Albert Thompson from Howard University.

This webinar was part of the ATTC and PTTC Networks’ listening session and strategic discussion series on emerging issues around COVID-19 and social determinants of health for the substance use prevention, treatment, and recovery workforces.